A Viking Saga: The Darkest Day

A Viking Saga: The Darkest Day

23/7/2013 1h 22m 3.9/10

Overview

Cast into a violent and bloody world of murder, Hereward, a novice monk, must deliver the Holy Gospel of Lindisfarne - a book of great beauty and power - to the safety of the Iona monastery, while being pursued by a Viking death squad hell- bent on its capture. On his way to the monastery, he meets a fierce and skilled swordsman who answers his prayers and dedicates his life to protecting Hereward while he delivers the book. In the midst of their journey, they are confronted by Vikings ready to kill in order to get what they want, leaving Hereward and his protector at their mercy.

Director

Chris Crow

Top Billed Cast

Elen Rhys

Elen Rhys

Eara

Mark Lewis Jones

Mark Lewis Jones

Aethelwulf

Marc Pickering

Marc Pickering

Hereward

Gary Mavers

Drengr

Michael Jibson

Michael Jibson

Hamal

Ioan Hefin

Ioan Hefin

Ambushing Bowman

Reviews

Wuchak

10/6/2018

7/10

Anglo-Saxon believers vs. Viking “devils” in the haunting woods of Britain The Viking era lasted roughly 300 years from about 790 to the Norman Conquest of England in 1066. The word ‘Viking’ comes from the Old English wicing, meaning pirate. The Vikings were Norse plunderers from what is modern-day Norway and Denmark who preferred to prey upon undefended rich monasteries in Britain and nearby regions. Their speedy longships gave them terrifying mobility. By the time an army was raised against them they had moved on to other raids. I bring this up to point out that the supposedly mighty Vikings were not noble warriors, but rather lowly brigands who preferred weak, defenseless victims. “A Viking Saga: Decision Day” (2013) drives this home and details a Viking raid on a monastery (mostly off-screen) and the subsequent pursuit through the haunting grey woods as the Viking chieftain seeks a priceless holy book in the possession of two monks who escaped the monastery. The sluggish, grim tone is akin to that of “Valhalla Rising” (2009), but I slightly prefer this one due to the potent theme, which addresses the folly of absolute pacifism vs. the wisdom of limited pacifism. The former stupefying-ly refuses to resort to physical violence under any conditions whereas the latter resorts to violence only when necessary and justified. The young simpering monk in the movie, Hereward (Marc Pickering), represents the view of absolute pacifism while the noble warrior, Aethelwulf (Mark Lewis Jones), represents limited pacifism. The monks adhered to the gross misunderstanding that revolves around Christ' teaching to "turn the cheek." The Messiah was referring to a backhanded slap to the face, which was an insult in that culture. In other words, we could all save ourselves a lot of trouble in life if we learn to ignore the antagonism of various morons who would like to divert our focus and ruin our day. The Old Testament teaches this as well: "A fool shows his annoyance at once, but a prudent man overlooks an insult" (Proverbs 12:16). So Christ was talking about giving an antagonist a break for the sake of peace in situations of personal offense; he was NOT referring to cases of criminal atrocities, which is what Viking raiders were guilty of committing. After all, why else do you think Christ allowed his disciples to carry swords, as chronicled in the Gospels? The bible says that governments are "God's servants" for good in the sense that they protect citizens from criminals and their military protects the people from foreign attack; in short, they "bear the sword," meaning that they possess the power to punish and even execute criminals or foreign raiders when justified (see Romans 13:1-6). Relating this to the movie, the monks were the government of their area and they in essence "bore the sword." As such, they would be perfectly justified in annihilating the Norse thugs from the face of the earth. It’s a lesson Hereward needs to learn IF he and his remaining loved ones are to survive. One last thing: Someone commented on how the Vikings are effectively depicted as diabolical fiends, which is true to a point. They’re also portrayed as mere men, who can be slain as easily as any other. This was a good call by the director in light of how Vikings are often depicted in a mythical super-heroic manner, which is light-years from the truth. They were wretched human pillagers, brutal murderers and sadistic rapists who deserved slain on sight. Speaking of which, the movie poster (and DVD cover) is thoroughly misleading and the clueless producer(s) responsible should be shot (not literally). The movie runs 1 hour, 28 minutes and was shot in Neath Port Talbot area in South Wales, Britain. The UK production reportedly only cost around $132,000, but you wouldn’t know that from viewing the movie; it looks more like a $2 million production. GRADE: B/B-

Similar Movies

How to Train Your Dragon

7.9

How to Train Your Dragon

2010

The Name of the Rose

7.5

The Name of the Rose

1986

Enter the Dragon

7.4

Enter the Dragon

1973

Son of the Mask

4.2

Son of the Mask

2005

The 13th Warrior

6.7

The 13th Warrior

1999

Atlantis: Milo's Return

6.3

Atlantis: Milo's Return

2003

The Golden Child

5.9

The Golden Child

1986

The Prophecy II

6.0

The Prophecy II

1998

Prince Valiant

5.2

Prince Valiant

1997

Ring of the Nibelungs

6.3

Ring of the Nibelungs

2004

Attack of the Normans

6.0

Attack of the Normans

1962

Beowulf & Grendel

5.5

Beowulf & Grendel

2005

Blood of the Templars

6.6

Blood of the Templars

2005